<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightview: A Better Lightbox (clone)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/</link>
	<description>The Web's CSS Site</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennison Uy</title>
		<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/#comment-1711</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennison Uy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/#comment-1711</guid>
		<description>Webwizard,
It is free for personal (non-commercial) use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webwizard,<br />
It is free for personal (non-commercial) use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webwizard</title>
		<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>webwizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>Too bad it's not free (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad it&#8217;s not free (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-01-29 : 7 seconden</title>
		<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-01-29 : 7 seconden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/#comment-783</guid>
		<description>[...] CSSVault Blog » Blog Archive » Lightview: A Better Lightbox (clone)? Eens nader bekijken. (tags: image javascript) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CSSVault Blog » Blog Archive » Lightview: A Better Lightbox (clone)? Eens nader bekijken. (tags: image javascript) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/#comment-781</guid>
		<description>I too like Lightview. I also like Thickbox for it's ability to have other content than just images displayed in the same 'overlay' fashion - even Flash movies work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too like Lightview. I also like Thickbox for it&#8217;s ability to have other content than just images displayed in the same &#8216;overlay&#8217; fashion - even Flash movies work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/28/lightview-a-better-lightbox-clone/#comment-778</guid>
		<description>Filesize is not a problem if you use compression.
Prototype and Scriptaculous combined are just 28k,
google for Protopacked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filesize is not a problem if you use compression.<br />
Prototype and Scriptaculous combined are just 28k,<br />
google for Protopacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
