<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS Drop Shadow Without Using Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/07/css-drop-shadow-without-using-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/07/css-drop-shadow-without-using-images/</link>
	<description>The Web's CSS Site</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: negs</title>
		<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/07/css-drop-shadow-without-using-images/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>negs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/07/css-drop-shadow-without-using-images/#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>Dan...I believe one reason might be if you had a bunch of elements of unknown height and width for which you wanted drop shadow. Perhaps not the purest use of css but a big time saver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan&#8230;I believe one reason might be if you had a bunch of elements of unknown height and width for which you wanted drop shadow. Perhaps not the purest use of css but a big time saver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennison Uy - Graphic Designer</title>
		<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/07/css-drop-shadow-without-using-images/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennison Uy - Graphic Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/07/css-drop-shadow-without-using-images/#comment-729</guid>
		<description>Good catch, jive.

Here's a link to the &lt;a href="http://www.webtoolkit.info/css-drop-shadow.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;demo page&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good catch, jive.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to the <a href="http://www.webtoolkit.info/css-drop-shadow.html" rel="nofollow">demo page</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jive</title>
		<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/07/css-drop-shadow-without-using-images/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>jive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/07/css-drop-shadow-without-using-images/#comment-727</guid>
		<description>It doesn't look right in IE7, the bottom is off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t look right in IE7, the bottom is off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Beeston</title>
		<link>http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/07/css-drop-shadow-without-using-images/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Beeston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssvault.com/blog/2008/01/07/css-drop-shadow-without-using-images/#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Why would you choose this over an image? The whole point of css is to remove the presentation from the markup. Now you've just got a nice pot of div soup. Sure it'll show up if your user has turned images off, but maybe there's a reason they turned images off in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you choose this over an image? The whole point of css is to remove the presentation from the markup. Now you&#8217;ve just got a nice pot of div soup. Sure it&#8217;ll show up if your user has turned images off, but maybe there&#8217;s a reason they turned images off in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
